Who is to blame?

While going over the readings regarding the danger of huge corporations, my mind was drawn to the examples that I grew up hearing regarding huge corporations that took advantage of the natural resources of certain African countries and left these countries somewhat destitute. For the longest time, none of the mining companies in the mineral rich country of Liberia were owned by local entrepreneurs. One of its largest exports, rubber, was only tapped by the huge multinational firm Firestone; who managed to sign a 100 year contract with the Liberian government that enabled them to continue producing rubber at dirt cheap prices. Shell also has a bloody and ugly history in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. But in all these cases I am left asking, where was the regulating hand of the government? While one can say that these companies have indeed taken advantage of the above mentioned countries, to name a few, one cannot downplay the role that governments have played in allowing these actions. I recognise that governments do need better information regarding the operation and long term planning of large corporations to make more informed decisions regarding their regulation, and this is to be provided by these multi-national corporations. But one cannot deny that governmental regulation has indeed been neglected in the past, rendering governments now almost powerless in dealing with large corporations.

4 Responses to “Who is to blame?”

  1. naomitt Says:

    In cases around the world, often it is the choice of a beginning, struggling government trying to bring money to their country any way possible. Recently, though, I read an interesting book titled McMafia that explained the situation of countries that allow corporations to come in, or even just any resource to be depleted or their national pride to be diminished in any way, were often countries that were heavily controlled by organized crime. I thought it was an interesting perspective on the culpability of governments.

  2. jldeng Says:

    Maybe those governments have not neglected the regulation but were frightened or bribed to pretend to be negligent.

    The title of this article reminds me of Congfucion’s wisdom that he believed that a country’s thriving depends on the moral standards.For example, the United States has been the most successful country in the world so far, because it has made enormous contributions to the world, such as: the participation of anti-fascist war, the promotion of democracy and philanthropy all over the world…etc. It is the same reason that Chinese people gave the United States a Chinese name, ‘Mei Guo’ which means ‘a beautiful country’, not only because of its beautiful landscape but also its beautiful soul. On the other hand, Chinese people have suffered a lot in the last two centuries, because of the corrupted and timid empire which was succeeded by a republican government. Neither of them cared for their citizens but their own survivals and greed. We can not only blame the invaders, because we understood we were rotten within.

  3. ssck4 Says:

    You bring up a really good point, that the governments of countries where unfair corporate ownership/business practice is institutionalized should take a huge part in the blame for the exploitation. But it also makes me think to what extent do countries have a choice or power in the situation, since a lot of them are in debt to begin with, and in order to borrow from the IMF for example, they have to institute a lot of free market policies or allow investment from outside. I’m not an expert on this by any means, but I think it is a very good point you bring up that the corporations are not solely responsible for the negative impacts of their practices, and to situate it in a more general context means looking at what is enabling/supporting their behavior and how the environment where this is ‘acceptable’ is developed

  4. stellerstella Says:

    Does Confucius really apply to America in a Positive way? Sure the American government supports global philanthropy to poor countries, but in most cases they are putting a band-aid on the problems that they or that thecooperations the government doesn’t regulate caused. America prospered by building its country and infrastructure on the backs of the poor and people of color. To me that is morally bankrupt. Those who have prospered in the last 400 years have done so by forcefully appropriating the means of substance from others (as marx would put it)


Leave a comment